In political circles, Lebanon is often referred to as a country ever permeable to external influence, where embassies and consulates hold sway. While this clichéd assertion may allow local stakeholders to shirk their responsibilities, it also reflects the ascendancy of external powers in major Lebanese elections, especially those for president.
Since 1943, no president can claim to have been elected without a regional and international green light. Over the decades, several foreign powers have had a say in choosing the Lebanese head of state, be it the United Kingdom, France, Syria, Iran, Egypt or the United States.
Once elected, a Lebanese president’s mandate may also depend on regional factors. This story is one of power games, diplomatic interference and precarious geopolitical balancing acts, which L’Orient-Le Jour aims to tell in a 13-part series.
This ninth installment of our series discusses the short-lived presidency of René Moawad (November 1989), which was the ultimate stumbling block to Damascus’ omnipotence in Lebanon.
L'Orient Today / By Mounir RABIH, 21 March 2023 19:16
The agreement was concluded by the various belligerents to end the Lebanese Civil War.Moawad’s election was the result of an agreement reached for several reasons. Firstly, he was a statesman who was both an independent and Chehabist — the...
The agreement was concluded by the various belligerents to end the Lebanese Civil War.Moawad’s election was the result of an agreement reached for several reasons. Firstly, he was a statesman who was both an independent and Chehabist — the...René Moawad, l’ultime grain de sable pour Damas...
You have reached your article limit
Add your voice to our engaged subscriber community and be part of the change.